|
|
Post by spyguy0045 on Mar 14, 2011 22:51:27 GMT -5
.5
|
|
|
|
Post by Hotshot on Mar 15, 2011 11:34:49 GMT -5
$.75M
|
|
|
|
Post by spyguy0045 on Mar 15, 2011 11:56:21 GMT -5
1
|
|
|
|
Post by Hotshot on Mar 15, 2011 15:35:33 GMT -5
$1.25M
|
|
|
|
Post by mchunter24 on Mar 15, 2011 16:47:53 GMT -5
1.5m
|
|
|
|
Post by Hotshot on Mar 15, 2011 19:07:24 GMT -5
$1.75M
|
|
|
|
Post by mchunter24 on Mar 16, 2011 18:49:52 GMT -5
2m
|
|
|
|
Post by Hotshot on Mar 17, 2011 10:17:51 GMT -5
$2.25M
|
|
|
|
Post by Benny on Mar 18, 2011 14:45:51 GMT -5
This signing has put Hotshot over the roster limit. Hotshot has until noon 3/19 to get back within the limit.
|
|
|
|
Post by kvill79 on Mar 19, 2011 22:30:45 GMT -5
Per rule: If an owner wins enough free agents to go over the roster limit, they will have 24 hours to get back under the limit. If the owner does not get back under the limit, the owner will lose the money spent on that player's contract and not get it back if the player signs with another team.
|
|
|
|
Post by spyguy0045 on Mar 20, 2011 1:40:06 GMT -5
clay hensley, .5?
|
|
|
|
Post by Benny on Mar 20, 2011 8:42:53 GMT -5
See, this is how things can get real messy real fast. Royals (Hotshot) didn't get back within the roster limit, but Matt's bids are invalid because they would put him over the cap. Clay Hensley is a Grumbler at a salary of $1MM.
|
|
|
|
Post by spyguy0045 on Mar 20, 2011 19:22:37 GMT -5
I thought the auction was re-started, no?
|
|
|
|
Post by Benny on Mar 21, 2011 7:59:04 GMT -5
As of previous bid, which was yours. If it re-starts, you'll likely pay more for him anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by spyguy0045 on Mar 21, 2011 10:07:24 GMT -5
alright, fine. I'll take him for 2 yrs.
|
|
